Australian Labor Party

Australian Labor Party
The Party for all Australians

Saturday, 10 January 2015

Queensland election 2015: Labor renews support for coal despite climate warning

Queensland election 2015: Labor renews support for coal despite climate warning


 TIM " I'M STUPID " MULHERIN BETRAY THE LABOR PARTY

Queensland election 2015: Labor renews support for coal despite climate warning






Queensland Labor commits itself to the state’s coal industry, but says new projects need to ‘stack up environmentally’











coalmining



Queensland’s outgoing deputy Labor leader, Tim Mulherin, has said coal
remains “an important and vital energy source for Queensland and the
rest of the world”. Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP


Queensland’s Labor opposition has renewed its commitment to the coal
industry for the “foreseeable future” despite a new study warning most
of the state’s coal must stay in the ground to avoid dangerous climate
change.



Responding to research quantifying for the first time the scale of disruption faced by Australia’s coal industry to avoid a 2C warming,
the outgoing deputy Labor leader, Tim Mulherin, said coal remained “an
important and vital energy source for Queensland and the rest of the
world”.



However Mulherin, who is about to relinquish his seat in the mining
boom town of Mackay, said new projects “can’t come at any cost” and
needed to “stack up environmentally”.



Advertisement
He
criticised the government’s multimillion-dollar commitments to help
Indian miner Adani open up the massive Galilee basin coalfields in
central Queensland.



Australia needs to forgo 90% of its coal reserves
to play its part in cutting CO2 emissions by 2050 to avoid more than 2C
warming, according to the study by the UCL institute for sustainable
resources.



Thermal coal from nine proposed projects in the Galilee, when burned
in export markets such as China and India, would produce an estimated 705m tonnes of CO2, more than Australia’s total greenhouse gas emissions of 542m tonnes a year.



Mulherin said the Newman government had “put the cart before the
horse and already committed millions in taxpayer money to fund a
development that would normally be funded by the private sector before
and all this before the necessary approvals have been gained”.



“There always need to be a balance between commercial development and
environmental considerations and the LNP have never been able to get
that balance right,” he said.



“Given the current unemployment rate of 6.9%, projects that lead to
job development are absolutely essential but they can’t come at any
cost.



“Any project needs to stack up environmentally and Queensland has a long history of being able to make that happen.”


Advertisement
Rather
than renewable energy sources, Mulherin pointed to gas-fired power as
an example of a lower emission source the state was moving towards.



“However, for the foreseeable future, coal will remain an important energy source especially for base load power,” he said.


The premier, Campbell Newman,
was joined on the election trail on Friday by Adani’s Australian chief
executive, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, telling reporters that the company’s
mine would bring 10,000 local jobs.



Janakaraj, who vowed the mine would proceed, despite controversies
including the boycott of the project by a number of major financiers,
said Adani “welcomed” government assistance but did not need it.



Newman said his government would work with miners to create up to 28,000 jobs.


Just weeks before calling the election, the government approved
another controversial project: a $900m expansion of a coalmine owned by
one of the LNP largest donors.



The government announced approval of New Hope’s Acland mine, west of Toowoomba, the week on the Friday evening before Christmas.


The attention of the state’s media that day was focused on the murder of 8 children in Cairns, and separately, the arrest of Clive Palmer’s publicist over an alleged criminal conspiracy.


New Hope and its parent company Washington H Soul Pattinson gave more
than $720,000 to the state LNP and the federal Liberal party between
2010 and 2013.



New Hope’s chairman, Robert Millner, was called before the Independent Commission Against Corruption
(Icac) in New South Wales last year over a donations controversy
involving another Washington H Soul Pattinson subsidiary of which he was
chairman, Brickworks.



Icac is due to complete its report this month on whether Brickworks’
donations to the Liberal party in NSW broke laws banning political
contributions from developers.



Activists have accused the Newman government of further burying the
New Hope approval with a snap summer holiday election announcement.



A Stop Brisbane Coal
Trains spokesman, John Gordon, said the government had “opted to cut
and run” from accusations of favouring a donor by timing its
announcement “in school holidays with the media in hibernation”.



A spokeswoman for the deputy premier, Jeff Seeney, has said donations
were “a matter entirely for” state and federal party organisations.



“They have nothing to do with the state government and nothing to do
with the independent coordinator general’s approval with conditions of
the New Acland stage three project,” she said.



The government approval dictated the footprint of the mine – which
would provide 700 new jobs – be reduced by 60%, its life cut by 13 years
to 2029, and its throughput by 2.5m tonnes to 7.5m tonnes.







Sunday, 4 January 2015

Labor to protect penalty rates: Cameron

Labor to protect penalty rates: Cameron

Labor to protect penalty rates: Cameron







Federal Labor Senator Doug Cameron
Labor senator Doug Cameron says his party will fight hard to protect penalty rates.
Source: AAP



FEDERAL Labor says it's in for a tough fight to ensure millions of
Australian workers keep weekend and public holiday penalty rates as
business launches a push for industrial relations reform across the
country.




"WORKCHOICES is not dead," Labor senator Doug Cameron said on
Saturday, following Fairfax Media reports that industry groups were
campaigning to wind back and cut weekend and public holiday penalty
rates, particularly in the hospitality sector.


"The Abbott
government ... is behind this push by business to try to cut the penalty
rates of ordinary Australian workers," Senator Cameron added. He
said around 4.5 million workers across the country depended on penalty
rates to "actually put food on the table, take the family out to get a
meal and go for a holiday once a year". "Penalty rates are extremely important," he said.
The reported campaign by industry comes as the Fair Work Commission
reviews more than 200 awards that provide minimum wage, hours and other
conditions.
The commission is also said to be separately examining penalty rates that will impact a number of awards. Senator Cameron said Labor was in for a tough fight to protect current penalty rates.
"The backbench of the Liberal party, cabinet ministers in the Liberal
party, big business, they are all lining up to take advantage of the
downturn in the economy and attack penalty rates," he said. "This is a campaign that's going to be a tough campaign, but it's a campaign that is right."
Senator Cameron was especially critical of moves by Australia's biggest
brickmaker, ASX-listed Brickworks, to cut penalty rates. "This is a multi-billion dollar business; it's simply about cost cutting," he said.
"This is a business that puts hundreds of thousands of dollars into
Liberal party funds, and now they want to take those funds out of the
pockets of their workers."

Luke Foley's deal with the devil

Luke Foley's deal with the devil





Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'GAPI:
Failed to request report data. Error: "GDatadailyLimitExceededQuota
Error: profileId ga:34132514 has exceeded the daily request limit."' in
/home/independ/public_html/_lib/classLib/gapi.class.php:220
Stack trace:
#0 /home/independ/public_html/_findStats.php(28):
gapi->requestReportData('34132514', Array, Array, '-pageViews',
'ga:pagePath==/p...', '2015-01-04', '2015-01-04')
#1 {main}
thrown in /home/independ/public_html/_lib/classLib/gapi.class.php on line 220

2



The likely next NSW Labor leader, Luke Foley (Image screenshot ABC 7.30 NSW)


Has a dirty deal been done to secure Luke Foley as the new NSW Labor Party leader? Peter Wicks from Wixxyleaks reports.



THERE ARE SOME in the NSW Labor Party celebrating an incoming Party leader from the Left in Luke Foley.
However, many rank and file members with their ear to the ground are
dismayed by what they see as a puppet of the Right about to become
anointed because of deals Foley is alleged to have done to become
leader.




Foley has managed to gain the support of Labor’s Right and, with Michael Daley admitting defeat already
and saying he will no longer contest the leadership, Foley is the last
man standing. The leadership is due to be confirmed by caucus on
Monday 5 January.




Senior Party sources have claimed that a deal has been done between
Foley, NSW general secretary Jamie Clements and Wollongong MP Noreen Hay.




This deal could see members resigning from the Centre Unity (AKA
Labor Right) faction in droves, as what is the point of being in a
faction whose leaders support a rival faction? If I were Michael Daley,
I would be seriously considering deserting the faction that betrayed me
and would be looking to take my supporters along with me.




Sources claim Noreen Hay, who is the convener of the Centre Unity
faction, of which Clements is a leading member, has used her position to
secure the votes for Foley from members of her faction.




So why would Hay, a convener of the Right faction, betray Daley, a
member of her own faction, to rally numbers for the Left candidate?




Sources have claimed that the deal is being done with Foley so that
Noreen Hay can secure the position of Party whip. The vast majority of
those in the Left could probably think of nobody worse to put in the
position of whip than Hay, as she comes with a lot of baggage. If the claim is true, it will do Foley’s leadership no end of harm.






So, what may be in this deal for Jamie Clements?



If Luke Foley is elected leader it is said there will be a need to
find him a lower house seat, which strikes me as odd, for two reasons.




Firstly, I didn’t think it was absolutely necessary to be a member of
the lower house to be Opposition Leader; to be premier, yes, but not
opposition leader, although I could be wrong. The other is that, given
there was going to be a vote for the Labor Leader shortly after the
March election, if Foley had ambitions for leader surely he would have
put himself in the running for a lower house seat in the last rounds of
pre-selections?




However, Foley’s bid for a Lower House seat may be a convenient way for Clements saving some face.



The Auburn pre-selection is
an ongoing saga which has already seen the Party suffer as a result of
alleged branch-stacking on a grand scale by Hicham Zraika — the
candidate who has the support of Jamie Clements and Laurie Ferguson, who would appear to have also worked together to ensure Ferguson’s allies were placed in other seats, such as Seven Hills.




With the incumbent Barbara Perry
going through the democratic Independent Appeals process regarding the
as yet undecided pre-selection, the result of that process could make
Clements position as State secretary untenable, given he oversaw the
pre-selection.




The Auburn pre-selection itself had some irregularities.



There was a last-minute change of venue which led to some confusion. I
have also been made aware of claims of scores of Hicham supporters
who, when asked by those giving out how to vote forms, seemed to have
suddenly forgotten what branch they attended.




Also extremely irregular was the fact that, after the election, the
uncounted votes were stored at the house of an employee of Sussex Street
for the weekend. This alone would throw the integrity of the entire
process into doubt given it was not overseen by the AEC. How on earth
could this be considered due diligence by Sussex Street?






Early indications appear to show that this Independent report, due
after the final hearing on 21 January will be absolutely damning and
some members of the rank and file, as well as some prominent insiders,
believe Clements may be hoping that parachuting Foley into the seat will
mean the Independent Review is cancelled and its findings not made
public.




Barbara Perry, despite the pressure, seems determined to ensure the process continues.



Whether or not she knows it, Barbara may just be making the stand
against the so-called faceless men and factional power-brokers that rank
and file members have been screaming for year after year. One would
certainly have to question the motives and vested interests of those who
do not welcome the continuation of this democratically approved and
vital process, given it only serves to promote transparency and enforce
ALP rules.




Foley has indicated that he wants to be pre-selected and does not wish to be “parachuted” into a seat.



However, any move to pre-select Foley in the Auburn seat can only be
seen as a “parachute”, given the voters who would elect him are
currently the subject of an Independent Review. Meanwhile, alleged
branch stacker Hicham Zraika is said to have been offered a safe
upper-house seat in exchange.




There are other seats for which Foley could run. Seven Hills would be
good, given it is set to be lost, after being held by Labor for over
half a century, due another poor, alleged branch stacking candidate, who
also holds more than questionable views on domestic violence. A candidate, once again, promoted by Laurie Ferguson.




Also on the possibilities list is Blacktown, given the unfortunate position in which recently deposed leader John Robertson finds himself.



However, I have heard rumours that Foley, who wishes to lead both the
Party and the State, may be inconvenienced by the extra travel to such
faraway places as the western suburbs, Labor heartland.






I have contacted Jamie Clements with some queries including the two important questions below;



Can you tell me where in the Party rules that it says that a
democratic pre-selection process can be interrupted in the middle of an
independent appeal?




Can members rely on you as their State Secretary to ensure that
absolutely no deals are done until the democratic process as stated in
our party rules regarding the Auburn pre-selection process is finalised?





As of publication, I have yet to receive a response from Jamie Clements.



Luke Foley has been in the press talking about the Party becoming more democratic under his leadership.



Given the allegations of a deal with Noreen Hay and given his
apparent plans to make the Party more democratic, I also sent some
questions to Foley, including these:




It has been alleged that a deal has been done to secure support
for you involving Noreen Hay with her seeking the Party Whip position,
can you confirm or deny this ?




With the talk from Sussex St being that you are going to bring
more democracy to the Party, can you explain why on of your first
actions will be to seek the denial of democratic process to Barbara
Perry?





Fairfax recently reported on the quest for the Auburn seat for Luke Foley and had this to say regarding Foley’s comments.



Mr Foley said he was "relaxed" about Ms Perry retaining her
candidacy at this stage, but said the pair would speak if he is elected
leader and "we'll see what eventuates".





In the article, Foley also talks of the Labor Party and State becoming a “social conscience” for the nation. However, the vast majority of members do not agree with his prehistoric, discriminatory views on marriage equality. Given the leader is there to represent those members, perhaps an attitude adjustment may be in order.





I certainly don’t agree with the way you suggest you will put
pressure on Barbara Perry to sacrifice herself because you failed to
make a legitimate run for the lower house through the pre-selection
process everybody else is forced to navigate.




As a member, I also question the way you achieved the support of the
Right — a method some may describe as dealing with the devil.




Social conscience indeed...



Peter Wicks is a member of the Labor Left faction of the ALP and a former NSW State Labor candidate. You can follow Peter on Twitter @madwixxy.

Tuesday, 30 December 2014

Things for Labor to ponder in the New Year. - The AIM Network

Things for Labor to ponder in the New Year. - The AIM Network



Things for Labor to ponder in the New Year.














I have been writing for the AIMN for about fourteen months.  Tony
Abbott being elected Prime Minister made me realise it is all hands on
deck to save this country and I have been trying ever since to inform
myself and others of the truth.



During that time I have read so many good suggestions mingled with a
lot of frustration.  To all who have made suggestions and passed on
things they have read, I thank you.  I have learned a lot.



I can only hope that someone with more power than a middle-aged woman in jammies has been listening to you.


In the New Year I hope that Bill Shorten and the Labor Party will
emerge with some ideas and commitments as to the direction in which they
want this country to go.



Here is my list of things I would like to hear about from Labor.


A firm commitment to action on climate change 


We have a government who sees our success in reducing emissions as a
reason to lower our targets instead of a spur to increase our goals and
speed up the inevitable adjustment to a sustainable energy future.



A commitment to defend Medicare


Consult with the health industry to come up with areas to make savings or use funding more effectively.


Consider raising the Medicare levy, consider voluntary euthanasia –
also consider explaining that we CAN afford universal health care and
make the case for it.



Investment in education


Commit to the original Gonski funding but don’t take money from the
universities to pay for it.  Education is an investment in our future. 
Take on board the suggestion for maths and science specialists in
primary schools.



Employment


Consider reinstating the Commonwealth Employment Service.  Currently,
employment and recruitment agencies take a lot of money from employers
while signing employees up to contracts that deprive them of
entitlements.  Eliminate the middle man, employ some public servants,
and hook people up with worthwhile employment.



Provide some form of a job guarantee where, rather than working for
the dole, unemployed people are paid the minimum wage to do worthwhile
jobs in the community and environment.



Public transport


Push the advantages of public transport for our cities and high speed rail linking our capital cities via regional areas.


Investment in research and innovation


Stop this ridiculous short term thinking that cutting funding to
agencies like the CSIRO is a saving.  We NEED ideas for the future and
employment for our best and brightest.  We also need agencies like the
BoM keeping us informed about the science.



Federal ICAC


We need this for so many reasons.  It MUST be done to put some integrity and trust back into the political system.


NBN


Is it too late to salvage the NBN?  Can something be done about Telstra’s strangle hold?


Asylum seekers


We need a completely new approach  where this discussion is put back
into perspective.  With over 60,000 people overstaying their tourist and
student visas last year, the few asylum seekers who come by boat should
hardly be considered a burden.



Change the debate to what Australia’s contribution to the global
refugee crisis should be and stop paying poor countries to shoulder our
responsibilities.



Foreign Aid


If we are to have any credibility, any decency, we must increase our
Foreign Aid back to promised targets and beyond if we can afford it.  We
use a disproportionate amount of the world’s finite resources and we
are not carrying our weight in paying for that by lifting others out of
poverty and protecting them from human rights abuses.



Income Inequality


It is unconscionable that 1 in 7 Australians live in poverty. 
Increasing Newstart and other welfare payments by $50 a week would go a
long way to producing a demand driven boost to the economy whilst
contributing to an easing of the health, educational and social
disadvantage felt by so many Australians.



Housing Affordability


With over 100,000 Australians homeless, we need to do something
urgently to help provide more affordable housing.  An important aspect
of Australia’s egalitarian past was home ownership.  Current policies
make this an unaffordable dream for most.



Childcare


Forget expensive paid parental leave and rebates for nannies – work
on providing quality affordable childcare for those of us who have no
choice but to work.






I understand that it costs money to provide the society we all want so here is a list of places to find some:


Corporate tax avoidance


Superannuation tax concessions


Capital gains and negative gearing tax concessions


A financial transactions tax


Increased Medicare levy


Changes to the provisional tax rates


Carbon pricing


An improved mining tax


Fossil fuel subsidies


Defence spending


Politicians (past and present) entitlements





I hope you use the break to come up with a plan and come out fighting
in 2015.  This middle-aged woman in jammies needs some help.






In "Rossleigh

Thursday, 25 December 2014

Parents Weighing Up What Age To Tell Children That Bill Shorten Doesn’t Exist

Parents Weighing Up What Age To Tell Children That Bill Shorten Doesn’t Exist


Parents Weighing Up What Age To Tell Children That Bill Shorten Doesn’t Exist


















bill shorten






Parents around Australia are wondering how long they should let their kids keep believing Australia has an Opposition Leader.


Perth mother Dianne Haynesly said she was unsure of the right age to
end the make-believe. “It’s hard to know when to break it to them. My
kids are in their teens and still just assume that he’s a real thing,”
she said.



Eleven year-old Noah White said his parents recently told him the
truth. “Until then I had just assumed he was real. But when you stop and
think about it, it’s true, you never actually see him, you just hear
about him from time to time”.



The Sydney primary school student admitted he had started to wonder
about the mysterious leadership figure. “We left out milk, cookies … a
disastrous budget. But he just left it there. It was a bit sus”.



Adelaide mother of four Sue Huntley said her kids all still think the
Opposition Leader exists. “It’s quite cute really. Although, that said,
they all stopped believing in Tony Abbott quite a while ago”.



For more breaking stories, follow The Shovel on Facebook and Twitter. For merchandise, visit The Shovel Shop.




Wednesday, 24 December 2014

Governments can't create community spirit, but they can support inclusion | Anthony Albanese

Governments can't create community spirit, but they can support inclusion | Anthony Albanese

Governments can't create community spirit, but they can support inclusion







Assisting people into work, making cities that are well designed, and
supporting non-government groups and volunteers: that’s what
Australians expect from their governments












sydney



‘A good way to get people to become full participants in what life has
to offer – including the dignity of work – is to help them engage with
their local communities.’
Photograph: flickr


“Just because you’re better than me, doesn’t mean I’m lazy.” So sang a
young Billy Bragg in his song, To Have and To Have Not, in 1983.



The context of the emergence of progressive artists such as Billy
Bragg was a potent reaction to the British government of Margaret
Thatcher.



A few years after Bragg’s song, Thatcher famously declared “there is
no such thing as society”, as she sought to ideologically justify
policies that left people to fend for themselves.



Implicit in Thatcher’s bleak worldview was the idea that if you were
disadvantaged, it was your own fault. That’s heartless and absurd.
Ignoring or marginalising people who are disadvantaged, or even
dysfunctional, will do nothing to improve their circumstances.



Advertisement
Indeed,
a good way to get people to become full participants in what life has
to offer – including the dignity of work – is to help them engage with
their local communities.



However, I fear that this trend toward pushing people down rather
than lifting them up will escalate in coming months with the appointment
of Scott Morrison as minister for social services.



Assisting people into work is a common objective because we have all
seen the harm welfare dependence can lead to. But the hidden message in
Morrison’s appointment is that he is about to be unleashed on people who
allegedly refuse to work.



Newspapers have been briefed to expect “welfare reform” under
Morrison. Columnists and editors are already using terms like bludgers
and rorters.



In the lead-up to Christmas, the Abbott government has announced
funding cuts to non-government organisations like Shelter Australia,
Blind Citizens Australia, Deaf Australia and Down Syndrome Australia.



Such groups play a vital role in supporting communities. And their success is usually driven in part by community volunteers.


Although there are those in the Abbott government who subscribe to
Thatcher’s doctrine, we’d do well to remind ourselves that it is
completely inconsistent with Australian values.



The values of mainstream Australian are on display right outside your
door right now – out in parks, pubs and churches where people are
coming together to celebrate Christmas.



Advertisement
In
the real world, far away from our nation’s parliaments and tabloid
hotheads, people are giving each other a fair go. They are dropping in
presents to their neighbours. My family looks forward to our next door
neighbour’s annual gift of a homemade ginger bread house.



Right now, people are rejoicing in what unites them. They are
encouraging each other, not blaming each other. They are embracing their
common humanity and trying to develop human interactions in ways that
enrich their lives.



Instead of setting people against each other, governments would achieve more if they did more to nurture communities.


Governments can’t create a community spirit. They can’t make people
be tolerant of each other, except through the personal example of
political leaders. But one thing they can do is deliver a physical
environment that promotes community engagement.



Promotion of inclusion through support of communities is one of the
drivers of federal Labor’s determination to develop comprehensive
policies on our cities. For too long, Australian governments have shown
inadequate interest in urban policy and the way in which well-designed
cities facilitate the human contact that people crave and which enriches
their lives.



We spend so much time designing our buildings that we give inadequate
thought to the spaces between those structures. If properly designed,
these spaces can provide focal points for local communities that
encourage interaction and inclusion.



It might be as simple as providing more shade around buildings and
more parks in our neighbourhoods. Greater use of mixed precincts that
include residential and public or entertainment space would also help
bring people together.



We need more parks, public areas and entertainment options that
deliver the environment in which communities flourish. We need
well-resourced libraries where people can come together to share
interests.



And we need to do all we can to ensure that hubs where people cross
paths most often – like shopping centres and train stations – also
include places where people can interact.



Some dismiss such ideas as not the province of the Commonwealth.
There is a role for commonwealth leadership to assist state and local
government as well as non-government organisations, to make our cities
more productive, sustainable and liveable.



When governments don’t value communities and when they treat people
as little more than economic units, people become alienated. Of course,
better urban design of itself won’t stop welfare dependence. Governments
should seek to encourage people into the workforce by providing
adequate resources for education and training and by eliminating welfare
fraud.



But better urban design will certainly help more than treating welfare recipients like cannon fodder in the political debate.


Thatcher was simply wrong when she said there was no such thing as society.


It’s right outside our door and we are all part of it. If we make our
communities work in positive ways, their power far exceeds that of the
sum of their component parts and can be used to achieve great social
outcomes.



But first we need to reject the idea that anyone on welfare has given
up and does not want to work. As Billy Bragg sang more than 30 years
ago, “Just because you’re going forward, doesn’t mean I’m going
backwards.”





Thursday, 18 December 2014

THIS IS.A REQUEST TO BILL SHORTEN TO HAVE THE COURAGE TO FORCE A DOUBLE DISSOLUTION. WE CAN'T HAVE THE LNP ANY MORE 

Sunday, 14 December 2014

Labor for Palestine: It's About Time | newmatilda.com

Labor for Palestine: It's About Time | newmatilda.com

Labor for Palestine: It's About Time



By Stuart Rees





It's
time for the ALP to ask itself serious questions about the situation in
Israel and move to new policy platform, writes Stuart Rees




Earlier
this week a meeting in was held in western Sydney to discuss whether
the Federal Labor Party should support Palestinians’ rights to
self-determination.



In response to the unspeakable suffering of all Palestinians -
Gazans, West Bankers, Arab citizens of Israel, and the 5 million
refugees still served by the UN Refugee Works Association (UNRWA) - why
would the ALP not take a stand for Palestine?    



But change from adherence to the Israeli narrative to fearless
support for the Palestinian cause may not be easy. Questions to ALP
members, which relate to the identity of a party which claims to promote
social justice, might do the trick. Here are the questions. 



Key Questions


How can you retain self-respect if you appear to collude with Israeli
Government’s occupation of Palestinian lands? Do you have any sense of
disbelief at the displacement and replacement polices which have been
occurring since 1948, or at the blood bath of Operation Cast Lead which
began on December 27, 2008? 



Surely the disproportionate use of force in the 2014 Operation
Protective Edge in Gaza would affect your attitude?In that operation,
over 2000 Palestinians were killed and 11,000 wounded. The non-combatant
ratio of Palestinians to Israelis who lost their lives was
approximately 600:1.



Eighteen thousand housing units were destroyed, 24 medical facilities
damaged and at least 16 health workers killed. Twenty-six schools were
destroyed, 228 were damaged and another 31 schools left to serve as
shelters for displaced people.



Will you acknowledge the unnecessary Israeli deaths but also the
massive imbalance in Israeli/Palestinian casualties, property destroyed
and the means of livelihood lost?



Since 2007, within Israel, at least 402 civilians and 58 security
forces have died as a result of suicide bombing. UN figures also
indicate that in Operation Protective Edge, the number of Palestinian
children killed – approximately 500 – exceeds the total number of
Israelis, civilians and soldiers, killed by Palestinians in rocket
attacks and all other attacks over the past decade.



Far away from the Middle East, Australians may become blasé about
body counts, but how could you not protest the cruelty involved  in
control of the most precious life force – water?



UN figures indicate that Israeli citizens receive 300 cubic meters of
water per year, Palestinians 35-85 cubic metres. Israeli settlers on
the West Bank are allotted 1,500 cubic metres and enjoy green lawns and
swimming pools while Palestinians often get no water at all. Haaretz
journalist Amira Hass warns there’s little point in arguing whether
Israelis’ water consumption is four or only three times that of
Palestinians. Instead she requests, “Open your eyes: the thick pipes of
the Mekorot (Israel’s national water provider) are heading to the Jordan
valley settlements, and a Palestinian tractor next to them transports a
rusty tank of water from afar.”



“In the summer, the faucets run dry in Hebron and never stop flowing in (settlements) Kiryat Arba and Beit Hadassah.”


On 9 February 2014, B’Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for
Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, reported that “over 90 per
cent of water in the Gaza Strip is unfit for drinking. Wastewater
treatment facilities have been damaged, sewage seeps into ground water
and fills the sea.”



Following massive floods across the Gaza Strip in early November
2014, the head of Gaza’s water authority admitted, “The recent war
destroyed everything in Gaza. Many sewage pipes and water networks are
still buried under the rubble.”



East Jerusalem Violence


The record of suffering grows. How would ALP members respond if they
observed the hopelessness which Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem
feel when faced with attacks from armed settlers?



Admittedly there have been awful tit for tat killings, as in the
recent fatal stabbings in a synagogue. This violence occurs in the
context of incitement from settlement leaders, Jerusalem being cut off
from the West Bank, more evictions, more house demolitions and excessive
police brutality.



Israeli author and human rights activist Jeff Halper calls the
collective punishment involved in the demolition of people’s homes,
‘atavistic revenge.’ He emphasizes that the targeting and punishing of
family members innocent of any crime constitutes a violation of Article
33 of the Geneva Convention relative to the ‘Protection Of Civilian
Persons In Time Of War.’



What do party members know of the civil rights of Palestinians living
on the West Bank and in an East Jerusalem almost completely surrounded
by large Israeli settlements?



Israeli leaders encourage Jews to attempt to worship in Moslem holy
places and have given a green light to settlers to attack Palestinians
and their property. Gershon Baskin writes,
“The only real services that Palestinian neighbourhoods of East
Jerusalem receive are those of Border Police arresting suspects, closing
neighbourhoods as well as house demolitions and taxation.”



He reminds us that 80 per cent of East Jerusalem Palestinians live under the poverty line.


Hate speech in Israel and from leading members of the Knesset is an
almost daily occurrence.  A right wing settlers’ slogan reads, “A Jew is
a blessed soul, an Arab is a son of a whore.”



In response to the current discrimination, hate speech and violence
in East Jerusalem, distinguished Palestinian lawyer Dianna Buttu
comments, “This has been the most dehumanizing ordeal in my experience.
All you hear about is the idea that Palestinians don’t value human life,
‘They have a culture of martyrdom’.”



To add to these cruelties a Jewish Nation State Bill is in legal
preparation as the right wing’s one-state solution which would include
the annexation of the territories and the establishment of a Jewish
apartheid State. Israeli journalist Gideon Levy writes that in the
proposed new law, Palestinians will become formally, legally second
class citizens. The architects of this new Israeli state must make sure
at any price that it will not be democratic and egalitarian.



Not Standing Alone


In recognising Palestine as a state, Australian Labor is not being
asked to go it alone, though there would be every reason for taking a
leadership role irrespective of the attitude of other nations.



Several European countries have already taken this stand. The Swedish
Government proposes to extend full diplomatic recognition to the State
of Palestine. By large majorities the Irish Parliament, the British
House of Commons, the Spanish Parliament and the French National
Assembly have voted to recognise the state of Parliament. The motion in
the French Assembly invited “the French Government to recognise the
state of Palestine in order to obtain a definitive settlement of the
conflict.”



Australian state Labor parties have also moved on this issue. A South
Australian Labor resolution mirrors similar statements passed in
Tasmania, NSW and Queensland. The South Australian resolution recognises
peace in the Middle East will only be assured by the foundation of a
Palestinian State based on 1967 borders with agreed land swaps and
security guarantees for itself and Israel.



“SA Labor welcomes the decision of the Palestinian Authority to
commit to a demilitarised Palestine with the presence of international
Peace keepers including US forces,” it says.



Will the Labor Party leadership also heed the cues being given by significant Israeli citizens?


In September 2014, 660 Israeli public figures called on the Danish
Parliament to recognise the State of Palestine. “This would be no
anti-Israel act,” they wrote, “it would help Israel’s future.”



In November 2014, 106 ex-Israeli generals, senior police, and former
heads of Mossad urged Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to negotiate with
“moderate Arab states and with Palestinians in the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip”.



Their letter refers to the Saudi backed peace proposal that was
adopted unanimously by the Arab league in 2002. It offered full peace,
diplomatic recognition, and “normal relations” between Arab states and
Israel in return for Israel’s withdrawal to borders based on the
pre-1967 armistice lines, with negotiated land swaps and a ‘just’ and
mutually ‘agreed’ compromise solution to the Palestinian refugee
problem.  



If Labor supports Palestine, will political leaders be sufficiently
resilient to not bend in the face of the torrent of derision which
always follows anyone who dares to criticise Israeli government
policies?  



In response to an article of mine explaining why the world wide
Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) movement was neither racist nor
anti-Semitic, one threatening letter read, “Go hide in a tunnel… or
stick a grenade up your arse like ur crocodile buddies”.



One of those crocodile buddies was presumably Bob Carr who had
identified and condemned the small group of largely Melbourne
businessmen who supported Israel’s fundamentalist position on illegal
colonies and who sought to veto any change in an Australian government’s
attitude towards Israeli policies.



Carr’s criticism prompted the usual howls of derision from the Israel
right or wrong lobby. Melissa Parke MP received similar vitriol when she spoke in the House of Representatives about the merits of the BDS campaign.




Labor politicians who have spoken in support of the rights of
Palestinians know that the criticism they receive is nothing compared to
the violence and humiliation meted out to Palestinians. They should
know that some Israeli leaders are also dismayed by reactions to any
criticism of the policies of their government.



Quoted in The New Yorker,
the current President of Israel Reuven Rivlin said, “It is time to
honestly admit that Israel is sick, and it is our duty to treat this
illness.”



He also commented, “I must say that I’ve been horrified by this
thuggishness that has permeated the national dialogue…I’m not asking if
we’ve forgotten how to be Jewish but if we’ve forgotten how to be
human.”



From Change of Attitude to Policy?


Beyond the symbolic importance of Labor recognising the state of Palestine, how might such a gesture be converted into a policy?


Although one state already exists in Israel/Palestine, and is about
to be consolidated in the Jewish Nation State Bill, the ALP policy still
envisages a two state solution. In which case a diplomatically sound
elaboration of ‘Labor for Palestine’ could be to return to UN Resolution
242 adopted unanimously in 1967.



Commitment to the terms of that resolution would require all the
parties to cease military activities and return to borders existing
before the 1967 war.



The ALP needs to recognise that if they want to remain a friend of a
democratic Israel, let alone find enough vestiges of humanity to support
the Palestinians, they should be urging negotiations under UN auspices
regarding the goals of Resolution 242. Those goals have much in common
with the Arab Peace Plan and with ALP state branch resolutions.



In the process of moving from a change of attitude to the crafting of
a new policy, emotions will come into play. But it should not take much
courage for Federal Labor to at last say, ‘We’ve had enough of cruelty
as a government’s policy. We’ve had enough of indifference to
international law. We object to violence from all sides but we have not
forgotten about justice; and we will not be intimidated by the Israel
lobby.’



In relation to a change of policy towards all Palestinians we want to
re-craft Gough Whitlam’s unforgettable slogan: ‘It’s about time!’’